EU, United States Politicians Urge IIHF to Ditch Belarus 2014
Back in 2009, the IIHF's Annual Congress accepted the bid of Belarus for the 2014 IIHF World Championships. The bid recognized the country's growing presence in the international hockey community, and their desire to build some world class facilities to host such events in the capital city of Minsk. There was little concern given towards the country's political status at the time, despite the fact that President Alexander Lukashenko had been in power for fifteen years at that point with relatively few democratic checks on his power.
But the Belarussian election of 2010 sparked a new wave of authoritarianism from the nation's leader, who himself is a huge hockey fan who still takes to the ice nearly every day. The election officially stated an overwhelming 80% support for Lukashenko's regime, but has been deemed fraudulent by the international community. Since the election, Lukashenko has taken to imprisoning opposition leaders and shutting down media outlets that support the opposition. The clampdown has been brutal: protesters have been beaten by the police, imprisoned and the trials against the protesters have been a farce. Here is one account from the New York Times on the trial of Dmitri Medved, a 51 year old arrested in the protests:
Mr. Medved’s supposed victims were officers from the elite police special forces, or Spetsnaz, burly men with buzz cuts who are trained to thwart insurrection.
Human rights workers, independent journalists and international observers have accused them of pummeling unarmed demonstrators with clubs and bare fists at the protest, in some cases breaking limbs and cracking skulls.
In their testimony, however, the police officers portrayed themselves as having been besieged, though no photos or video have yet surfaced that show the police in such a position that night.
"The people pounced on us, punching us," said Aleksei Sakach, the first officer to speak. He said he lost his shield and his helmet in the fray, and had to seek medical attention for an injured left arm.
Others offered similar, sometimes identical, testimony.
Needless to say, President Lukaschenko has become an international pariah, and sanctions have now been imposed on his regime from the United States and European Union. And now, the United States and the EU are looking to the IIHF to withdraw Belarus' winning bid for the 2014 World Championships, led by current Member of the European Parliament and Hockey Hall of Famer Peter Stastny.
Stastny and United States Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) wrote a letter to IIHF President Rene Fasel urging the organization to revoke the awarding of the World Championships to Belarus, stating that until Lukashchenko releases all the political prisoners currently incarcerated that the country should "not receive the international sanction or legitimacy that would be conveyed by hosting the 2014 Championship."
Attempts to reach out to Sen. Dick Durbin's office were made, but they were not ready to comment on the matter at this time.
The issue was brought up during the IIHF's Annual Congress, but little has been said publicly about the discussion. The IIHF's website makes no mention of the issue, while I have only seen some commentary come up via Twitter from Finnish Ice Hockey Federation President Kalervo Kummola, in a translation by Juha Hiitelä, a Finnish sports writer. The comment was apparently made in an interview with Finnish television station YLE:
Kummola said in YLE interview: "EU Parlament can't force us to take World champs away from Belarus in 2014."
Silence appears to be the name of the game right now. Few questions have been asked, and fewer answers have been given. Its the nature of the uneasy relationship between politics and sports, something that came up quite often with the awarding of the 2008 Olympics to Beijing. What will the 2014 World Championships mean for the various international federations? Will the proceedings be marred with national federations being told to boycott if the political situation remains toxic with Lukaschenko still in power? Can, and should, the IIHF backtrack from their awarding of the games? Or will the political grandstanding just be ignored and the sport will simply go on unaffected by the autrocities?
Its hard to imagine right now in 2011 that Lukaschenko will either step aside or allow reform. Recent bombings in Minsk could offer the IIHF an out for security reasons. The country appears to be unraveling due to economic factors related to the political situation. In the midst of this, Lukaschenko remains defiant, even blaming the bombings on too MUCH democracy in the country:
"Above all, the government is to blame for this," Mr. Lukashenko said in his annual state of the nation address. "We have had so much so-called democracy that it has made us nauseated."
The IIHF might not need to make a courageous political stand to enact further pressure on Lukaschenko's dictatorship. It might simply be in the IIHF's members best interest, security-wise, to seek an alternative host for 2014.
Of course, according to Belarus, the IIHF won't be changing course. We'll see.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It’s very regrettably that sport and politics mixed in such way. Why people in Belarus cant just see good international event on their native land? Looks like we cold war didn’t end. 1980 Summer Olympics boycott
That’s exactly the point, though. What good is an international sporting event going to do for the citizens of Belarus in the midst of living under an authoritarian regime? I’ll give you a hint: the answer is absolutely nothing.
Oh, yeah. Happy people live only in democratic countries like USA and nothing can happen in such place like Minsk. I understand your point of view.
Wow, way to misread my entire statement and trivialise the discussion.
I never once stated that ‘happiness’ is the property of a particular style of governance. That’s a silly assumption. What I’m saying is that the population of Belarus is extremely unlikely to ever actually enjoy the spoils of what this tournament could potentially bring. Not only that, the human rights abuses that are perpetrated by the Belarussian government are widely publicised, and are being tacitly supported by the international community by awarding the state this tournament.
Spoils like “Minsk Arena” and growing interest for hockey in country? It’s actually that this tournament about – help developing hockey in selected place.
There is more to life than having a big new arena that will only play host to major league hockey. I love this sport to death, but it’s not the most important thing in life.
You are funny man. I didnt say it’s the most important thing in life. I said WHC need for development hockey. I dont want to argue with you about belorussians and what they want, it’s silly. They can make their choice themselves.
Never an easy answer in situations like this, but like the USA/USSR protesting each other’s olympics, it would be a mistake to keep the Worlds from Belarus. Only the people would suffer. One can only hope the unrest in the Middle East will find its way to Belarus in good time.
Only the people would suffer.
That’s a bold, and ultimately naïve, assumption to make. Major sporting events in authoritarian countries have never resulted in any sort of benefits for the citizens of the states that held them (see: China, the Soviet Union, Germany), only benefits for the political and economic elite. If what I know about the Belarussian regime holds true during the 2014 WHCs, the Belarussian attendees will be politicians, representatives from firms that created infrastructure, the families of players and officials, and screened citizens that won’t do something like, say, wave the white-and-red flag.
At best, the average Minskian may be invited to see a game, but what does that do for their long-term social welfare?
You are clearly not very good at figuring out someone’s political disposition. I’m a social democrat, and despise sensationalistic media such as Fox. My concerns are human rights and dignity; something that remains unaddressed by the international community as it tacitly supports Belarus’s hosting of the WHC. Also, if you may recall, China hosted the Olympics in 2008, not the 1980s. But that’s not even relevant to the discussion.
There are plenty of non-sensationalistic non-governmental organisations that are aware of how Belarussians are treated by their government, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Human Rights House, as well as intergovernmental organisations like the European Union, as well as federal governments in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, amongst others.
This is not a political issue: the Belarussian government is despotic and frequently violates the basic human rights of its’ citizenry.
This all one political block. Let me speak about Georgia and attitude of this organizations to situation in this country. One-sided point of view.
He provides sources that are non-governmental
and you say they’re “all one political block.” You obviously either misunderstood his point or didn’t care to understand it.
There are people from every corner of the political spectrum calling out Belarus for what they have done. This is not just the conservatives, centrists, or liberals. This is everyone. And in multiple countries.
Belarus has committed Human Rights violations against not only it’s own citizens but citizens of other nation’s. If you deny this, you’re either lying, trying to spread propaganda, or both.
by geoffissiffoeg on May 14, 2011 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions
political are not only party, for example NATO – military-political block and if you called “non-governmental” as synonym to “independent” it’s not true because financing for large part from USA and allies. Yes, government violates Human Rights but there are many over countries in more bad situations and to mix politics and sport is not right (diplomacy not sport)
Still they're not all one political block.
There are separate parties, interest groups, organizations, etc. with different views. One common view does not make them one big group.
by geoffissiffoeg on May 15, 2011 3:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Great article. While I wish this was just an isolated case of sports federations using excuses of trying to increase fanbase and introducing kids to sports as reasons to ignore human oppression. There is a point where increasing fans to a game is just not worth the sacrifice. If the IIHF would look at it from any other angle, they would see that this does nothing to support growing hockey in other parts of the democratic world. Ignoring the fact that public funds (which I assume are in short supply and people seem to have no say in how they are spent) are being used to satisfy Lukaschenko hobby is the IIHF taking advantage of the oppression of a nation. Well I wish that this wasn’t a common problem in the sports world, I am also equally disappointed that my favorite game is using this situation to their benefit.
I hate to see politics interfere in sports
but sometimes it is unavoidable. While I find Human Rights violations offensive beyond belief, I have to ask: where was all the protest when the IIHF awarded it in 2009? If the world at large truly didn’t want Belarusians to host it they could have shifted their votes to one of the other three candidates: Hungary, Latvia, or Ukraine.
While politics occasionally prevent tournaments from happening or teams from playing (both the UAE federation and team wanted to play in the 2011 Div III tournament but UAE law prevents it’s clubs and national teams to play against clubs from and the national teams of Israel), I don’t believe anything will come of this and the nations involved will still field teams in 2014.
I think the point so far is things have gotten worse in the past 24 months to the point where countries are more thoroughly examining their relationship with Belarus.
I find it hard to look at the situation and think that this event will hurt the Belarussian people. Despite everything, the development of ice hockey in Belarus is definitely a focus of the government, no matter what other things they do. But I think there are legitimate security concerns to go along with this. This involves the players, staff, and fans of all the participating countries. Such a high profile event could become a target for opposition, be it non-violent or violent. Planning for an alternate venue should be in the cards… perhaps Sochi wouldn’t be a bad choice, given they’ll have just wrapped up a much more major event.
I do also wonder what the major title sponsors like Skoda and Nike feel they’re getting for their sponsorship value in 2014 as a result.
Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.
For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.
Sochi would be a good idea to an extent
but a lot of people would be annoyed that Russia would host 2014 and then again in 2016 unless 2016 was then reassigned to another nation.
by geoffissiffoeg on May 15, 2011 2:10 AM EDT up reply actions
The idea that the Belarussian regime is somehow worse now than it was 5 or 10 years ago is ridiculous. Lukashenko is—and has been for over a decade, an authoritarian dictator. He’s been publicly known in Europe as “Europe’s last dictator”. The various differing stances the West have taken on him and his government only serve to directly demonstrate the open hypocrisy with which the West often deals with foreign authoritarian governments.
Turkmenistan is the gravest example. Niyazov was one of the worst dictators in the entire world. Among his countless feats were shutting down hospitals outside of the capital, shutting down libraries to keep the people ignorant and uneducated, renaming a month after his mother, renaming the capital (and another city) after himself, removing the pensions from the nation’s elderly, and I haven’t even delved into his own personally written bible and how it has been used to indoctrinate the nation’s youth and develop a cult of personality, the likes of which I do not think the world has ever seen. Effectively, he completely ruined the country’s infrastructure.
Yet, neither Niyazov nor his government ever faced any sanctions. On the contrary, due to the wealth of the country’s natural gas resources Niyazov was heavily courted by the European Union. US oil interests wanted a pipe-line leading to Afghanistan to run through the country.
The problem here is that for this type of message to have any kind of credibility, the hosting of the World Championship should never have been awarded to Belarus. To take it away now is tantamount to saying: “Whoops. We didn’t quite realise you were such a bad guy. Our bad.” It’s dumb, it’s hypocritical and I don’t even think it sends any form of real message to Lukashenko or his government. That ship has sailed.
"In the depths of winter, I learned there was in me an invincible summer" ~Albert Camus
Which is why the only reason to pull the tournament from Belarus now should be security reasons, not political. And it looks like Lukaschenko is having to become MORE authoritarian in order to achieve security… and the response is becoming more violent (Minsk bombings).
Puck Worlds: Chasing Pucks from here to Turku.
For Twitter Updates on Puck Worlds, follow @puckworlds. For updates plus additional witty banter from yours truly, follow @saskhab.
by Bruce Peter on May 15, 2011 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions
To be fair, the U.S. and the EU are threatening to impose more sanctions on Belarus, in addition to the travel bans in place on much of the upper strata of Belarussian politics. The international community (Russia notwithstanding) has certainly noticed the problems with the Lukashenko government; they were simply absent during the awarding of the 2014 WHC.

by 







